DynamoDB is a NoSQL database provided by Amazon, it works as a key-value store or document database with really fast response times. It's fully managed, taking this burden from you and it has many features built in. In this post, we are going to migrate a CLI application from using local storage to use DynamoDB and go through the basic operations of its SDK in the JVM.
We have this application called Tasqui that can be found in THIS repository. It is another todo list for the command line. I know, very creative.
Right now this application has 3 main actions add, tasks, remove.
$ tasqui
Usage: tasqui [OPTIONS] COMMAND [ARGS]...
Options:
-h, --help Show this message and exit
Commands:
add Add new task
tasks Prints all tasks
delete Delete a task
It's a very simplistic application and everything is saved to a JSON file. Recently I thought that having everything synced between my personal and work laptops would be a great idea.
Using a relational database for that would be very annoying. I don't want to deal with a schema right now and I don't want to be stuck with my past decisions. Since the application is already saving a JSON file, DynamoDB is a good option (and if I chose an RDBMS, I could not write about DynamoDB).
aws CLIWe need access to our application to read and write. Is good pratice to have a user for each application, so we will create one and assign a role to it.
When creating a user for your application you must know which kind of permissions you will give to him, starting with the Access Type. In this case we are creating a user for our application, so we don't have any reason to give access to the AWS Management Console.
Going forward we have to deterine the level of access our user will need and choose appropriate roles. The application is Reading and Writing from a single DynamoDB table, the AmazonDynamoDBFullAccess you will grant access to all tables and features. If you need to be more restrictive, it is possible to create a custom policy just to grant access the desired resource.
After the user is created we will be provided with an Access Key ID and a Secret Access Key, you need to keep those two keys in a safe place because you will need to use them to connect to DynamoDB. If something happens to the key pair you will have to create a new key pair.
In case you don't have the aws cli installed and configured you can follow these steps: - Installing the AWS CLI - Configuring the AWS CLI
Now we have everything set up, we can move forward and start the work at our application.
Reminder: Always give the least previlege possible to a user, if your access keys leak you will have less trouble to recovery.
Is possible to do those changes in a test-driven way by writing integration tests for all the methods that are going to be needed. The only question is:
How we are going to test our changes?
Fortunately, Amazon provides a local version of DynamoDB that can be used with docker, so I think we should use it.
We can start creating a docker-compose.yml and mapping the ports, no other changes are required since the default configuration is what we want for testing. You can start the db using docker-compose up.
version: '3.1'
services: dynamo: image: amazon/dynamodb-local:1.11.475 ports: - "8000:8000" The default configuration is:
Port: 8000 # => Default port
InMemory: true # => The database will be saved in memory, everytime your container stops you will lose all the data
DbPath: null # => Path of the database file, can't be used with InMemory
SharedDb: false # => Use the same database independent of region and credentials
shouldDelayTransientStatuses: false # => It's a delay to simulate the database in a real situation
CorsParams: * # => CORS configuration to give access to foreign resources
We can see if everything is working by executing in our command line:
$ aws dynamodb list-tables --endpoint-url http://localhost:8000
{
"TableNames": []
}
The --endpoint-url http://localhost:8000 is very important, without this option the request will be redirected to the default endpoint.
With the container running we can start to think about how we are going to set up our tests for the feature. The first thing is to bring the DynamoDB sdk to our project:
implementation 'software.amazon.awssdk:dynamodb:2.4.0'
Now we can finally start to write some code, we already have a repository and we want to be able to switch between implementations. So let's extract an interface from LocalFileTaskRepository with the method save.
First, we extract an interface from our repository with the method save.
interface TaskRepository {
fun save(task: Task)
}
Let's make a test for our repository. Starting our test we are going to need to connect to the database and create the table before doing any testing.
class DynamoDBTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `add Task to table`() {
val endpoint = "http://localhost:8000"
val dynamoDbClient = DynamoDbClient.builder()
.endpointOverride(URI.create(endpoint))
.build()
}
}
The connection is very straightforward since we don't have to authenticate to connect to our local DynamoDB, the only thing that we have to do is to set our endpoint to be http://localhost:8000. With the dynamoDbClient now we can proceed to create the table.
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
...
dynamoDbClient.createTable { builder ->
builder.tableName("tasqui")
builder.provisionedThroughput { provisionedThroughput ->
provisionedThroughput.readCapacityUnits(5)
provisionedThroughput.writeCapacityUnits(5)
}
builder.keySchema(
KeySchemaElement.builder()
.attributeName("task_id")
.keyType(KeyType.HASH)
.build()
)
builder.attributeDefinitions(
AttributeDefinition.builder()
.attributeName("task_id")
.attributeType(ScalarAttributeType.N)
.build()
)
}
}
}
So, what's going on in this createTable method? Let's break down command by command and see:
builder.tableName("tasqui")
This is a fairly easy part, we are just setting the name of the table, then we have:
builder.provisionedThroughput { provisionedThroughput ->
provisionedThroughput.readCapacityUnits(5)
provisionedThroughput.writeCapacityUnits(5)
}
This part is seeting the throughput for the table, which is the ability to read and write things to the db. We are setting the read and write throughput to 5, but 5 what exactly? How the throughput is calculated?
The throughput is measured in units, each unit might have different values depending on which kind of operation you are doing. For reads, each unit is 4Kb/s for consistently strong read, and 8Kb/s for eventually consistent. Writes are a bit easier, 1 unit is 1Kb/s and you don't have any difference between strong or eventual consistency.
In this case, 5 was chosen since is the default value that Amazon gives to you in the free tier.
Moving to our actual table, we have to set the Primary Key:
builder.keySchema(
KeySchemaElement.builder()
.attributeName("task_id")
.keyType(KeyType.HASH)
.build()
)
builder.attributeDefinitions(
AttributeDefinition.builder()
.attributeName("task_id")
.attributeType(ScalarAttributeType.N)
.build()
)
This sets the Primary Key to be named task_id and to have a Partition Key only by defining the keyType to HASH, then we set the type of our key, in this case, is an integer so we set as ScalarAttributeType.N. You can also set has a string or binary.
Now everything is ready we can start writting our assertion. We want the repository to save a task in the database, so we can query for the object that we just saved to see if it is really there.
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
...
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
GetItemRequest.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.key(mapOf("task_id" to AttributeValue.builder().n("1").build()))
.build()).item()
val storedTask = Task(item["task_id"]!!.n().toInt(), item["description"]!!.s())
Assertions.assertEquals(storedTask, task)
}
}
The sdk provides the method getItem to query specific items from the database, we have to build a GetItemRequest passing the tableName and the key.
The key is a map with the name of your Primary Key and the value that you want to query. The return of getItem is a GetItemResponse that has only two methods item and consumedCapacity. In this case we get the item which is Map<String, Attribute> where we can map to our Task object. Building the AttributeValue isn't very complex but the naming behind the methods isn't the best, so you can look at the docs to know what they do. Finally, we compare the task from the database with our task.
The only thing missing is our actual class and the call for the save method between the setup and the assert.
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
...
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
val dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDbClient)
dynamoDbTaskRepository.save(task)
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
...
}
}
class DynamoDbTaskRepository(private val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) : TaskRepository {
override fun save(task: Task) {
TODO("not implemented") //To change body of created functions use File | Settings | File Templates.
}
}
Run the tests, and see them failing for the right reason.
kotlin.NotImplementedError: An operation is not implemented: not implemented
at com.github.andre2w.tasqui.DynamoDbTaskRepository.save(DynamoDBTaskRepository.kt:8)
at com.github.andre2w.tasqui.DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould.add Task to DynamoDB$com_github_andre2w_tasqui_main(DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould.kt:47)
...
Now we are ready to implement the production code. We have the dynamoDBClient being injected in the repository, so the next steps are:
item to be insertedputItemclass DynamoDbTaskRepository(private val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) : TaskRepository {
override fun save(task: Task) {
val item = mapOf(
"task_id" to AttributeValue.builder().n(task.id.toString()).build(),
"description" to AttributeValue.builder().s(task.description).build()
)
dynamoDbClient.putItem(
PutItemRequest.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.item(item)
.conditionExpression("attribute_not_exists(task_id)")
.build())
}
}
We transform the Task into Map<String, AttributeValue> and we use the putItem method with a PutItemRequest that we build to insert the item in the table. The insertion seems to be very straight forward beside the .conditionExpression("attribute_not_exists(task_id)"). This conditionExpression method is a way to filter or create checks before we make a change in our items, we don't want to override a task if that task already exists, you can see the documentation about conditionExpression here.
With everything ready, we run the tests, not the jewels, again and this happens:
software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ResourceInUseException: Cannot create preexisting table (Service: DynamoDb, Status Code: 400, Request ID: d9056558-bb38-4119-a89d-d2323e859a68)
Wait, why? This is a tutorial, things are supposed to work out fine without errors, if I wanted errors I could have gone elsewhere. This error is happening because we created the table in the previous test, and every time we run the tests we need a new table, a table so fresh that will move to Bel-Air to live with his uncle. So this time we are doing a docker-compose down to erase our container and set up again with docker-compose up -d. Now our tests should be passing.
The test is passing but is relying on the fact that the table doesn't exist. This isn't great, so must be fixed by deleting the table before the tests start. This piece of code is added before the createTable call and run the test more than once with the same container (or just keep running the tests furiously to see them passing one after another).
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
...
val tableExists = dynamoDbClient.listTables()
.tableNames()
.contains("tasqui")
if (tableExists) {
dynamoDbClient.deleteTable(
DeleteTableRequest.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.build())
}
dynamoDbClient.createTable { builder ->
...
}
}
}
With the first test passing, it's time to move to the next step, we need to refactor our code. The first thing noticeable is all the DynamoDB code inside the test, creating the connection, deleting and creating the table, retrieving the Task, all that stuff should not be inside the test, instead, a new helper class could be created.
DynamoDBHelperThe helper class that has all the methods that the tests are going to use encapsulated, so there is no need to worry with the implementation. The first step is to create the class and make that generate the DynamoDBHelper class with DynamoDbClient as a property.
Add the DynamoDBHelper with the property, and create a static function that connects to the database and create a new instance of DynamoDBHelper, and back in the test class just change the old dynamoDbClient variable to use the one from the helper.
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
companion object {
fun connect(endpoint: String = "http://localhost:8000"): DynamoDbHelper {
val dynamoDbClient = DynamoDbClient.builder()
.endpointOverride(URI.create(endpoint))
.build() ?: throw IllegalStateException()
return DynamoDbHelper(dynamoDbClient)
}
}
}
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
val dynamoDbHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
val dynamoDbClient = dynamoDbHelper.dynamoDbClient
...
}
If all tests are passing, and they should be (I think), then it's time to move to the next step.
In this step, we have to move code from the test class to the initialization of the helper. Start by extracting all the code for the table (create/delete) into a method.
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
val dynamoDbHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
val dynamoDbClient = dynamoDbHelper.dynamoDbClient
setupTable(dynamoDbClient)
...
}
private fun setupTable(dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
//all that code to delete and create the table
}
}
Move that method to the DynamoDBHelper class, change so it can use the dynamoDbClient from the helper, and make the test call the method in the helper:
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
fun setupTable() {
val tableExists = dynamoDbClient.listTables()
.tableNames()
.contains("tasqui")
if (tableExists) {
dynamoDbClient.deleteTable(
DeleteTableRequest
.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.build()
)
}
dynamoDbClient.createTable { builder ->
builder.tableName("tasqui")
builder.provisionedThroughput { provisionedThroughput ->
provisionedThroughput.readCapacityUnits(5)
provisionedThroughput.writeCapacityUnits(5)
}
builder.keySchema(
KeySchemaElement.builder()
.attributeName("task_id")
.keyType(KeyType.HASH)
.build()
)
builder.attributeDefinitions(
AttributeDefinition.builder()
.attributeName("task_id")
.attributeType(ScalarAttributeType.N)
.build()
)
}
}
}
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
val dynamoDbHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
val dynamoDbClient = dynamoDbHelper.dynamoDbClient
dynamoDbHelper.setupTable()
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
val dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDbClient)
dynamoDbTaskRepository.save(task)
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
GetItemRequest.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.key(mapOf("task_id" to AttributeValue.builder().n("1").build()))
.build()).item()
val storedTask = Task(item["task_id"]!!.n().toInt(), item["description"]!!.s())
Assertions.assertEquals(storedTask, task)
}
The tests are passing, everything is going fine in the code but having to set up the table manually isn't the best option, so just move that setupTable to the initialization of DynamoDBHelper and make it private.
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
init {
setupTable()
}
...
}
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
val dynamoDbHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
val dynamoDbClient = dynamoDbHelper.dynamoDbClient
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
val dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDbClient)
dynamoDbTaskRepository.save(task)
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
GetItemRequest.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.key(mapOf("task_id" to AttributeValue.builder().n("1").build()))
.build()).item()
val storedTask = Task(item["task_id"]!!.n().toInt(), item["description"]!!.s())
Assertions.assertEquals(storedTask, task)
}
}
This part is like the previous one where the method will be moved to the helper and the test will use the newly created method.
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
init {
setupTable()
}
fun findById(taskId: String): Task {
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
GetItemRequest.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.key(mapOf("task_id" to AttributeValue.builder().n(taskId).build()))
.build()
).item()
return buildTask(item)
}
private fun buildTask(item: MutableMap<String, AttributeValue>) =
Task(item["task_id"]!!.n().toInt(), item["description"]!!.s())
...
}
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
val dynamoDbHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
val dynamoDbClient = dynamoDbHelper.dynamoDbClient
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
val dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDbClient)
dynamoDbTaskRepository.save(task)
val storedTask = dynamoDbHelper.findById(task.id.toString())
Assertions.assertEquals(storedTask, task)
}
Kotlin allows the creation of extension functions, so it's possible to change the buildTask method to be something more idiomatic like Task.from(item) while making the method only visible inside the helper.
Start adding a companion object inside the Task class:
data class Task(val id: Int, val description: String) {
companion object
}
add them insde the helper add the extension method:
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
...
fun findById(taskId: String): Task {
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
GetItemRequest.builder()
.tableName("tasqui")
.key(mapOf("task_id" to AttributeValue.builder().n(taskId).build()))
.build()
).item()
return Task.from(item)
}
...
private fun Task.Companion.from(item: MutableMap<String, AttributeValue>) =
Task(item["task_id"]!!.n().toInt(), item["description"]!!.s())
}
Now the test isn't cluttered with all the database code, the only thing missing is to remove the dynamoDbClient and extract the strings inside the helper.
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
val dynamoDbHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
val dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDbHelper.dynamoDbClient)
dynamoDbTaskRepository.save(task)
val storedTask = dynamoDbHelper.findById(task.id.toString())
assertEquals(storedTask, task)
}
All the references for task_id and tasqui are using the variable instead of the string now.
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
init {
setupTable()
}
private val primaryKey = "task_id"
private val tableName = "tasqui"
...
fun findById(taskId: String): Task {
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
GetItemRequest.builder()
.tableName(tableName)
.key(mapOf(primaryKey to AttributeValue.builder().n(taskId).build()))
.build()
).item()
return Task.from(item)
}
...
}
Moving forward with the changes, it's time to implement the retrieval of the data from Dynamo. In the first test, a query was implemented but to get all the data from the table a scan operation will be needed.
Query: A query searches the table based on the Primary Key, a sort key can be used to refine the results, and the results are always sorted by the sort key. All queries are eventually consistent(unless said otherwise) and always scanned forward.
Scan: Examines every item in the table and return all data attributes. It's possible to use ProjectionExpression parameter to refine the scan. Since Scan dumps the entire table, then filter out the results, the operation will get slower if the table grows.
Scan is the right option for the all() method, and the test can be approached in the following way:
@Test
internal fun `retrieve all Tasks`() {
val task1 = Task(1, "Task description")
val task2 = Task(2, "Another task description")
val dynamoDBHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
val dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDBHelper.dynamoDbClient)
dynamoDBHelper.save(task1, task2)
val tasks = dynamoDbTaskRepository.all()
assertEquals(listOf(task2, task1), tasks)
}
The setup is basically the same thing from the previous one but the Task must be persisted using the DynamoDBHelper. The code from the repository can be used here:
fun save(vararg tasks: Task) {
tasks.forEach {
dynamoDbClient.putItem(
PutItemRequest.builder()
.tableName(tableName)
.item(it.toAttributeMap())
.conditionExpression("attribute_not_exists(task_id)")
.build())
}
}
To make easier to insert multiple tasks
varargcan be used, it translates to the spread operator in java likeTask ...tasks.
Running the tests, everything is failing for the right reason, time to go for the production code.
class DynamoDbTaskRepository(private val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) : TaskRepository {
override fun all(): List<Task> {
val scanResponse = dynamoDbClient.scan { scan ->
scan.tableName("tasqui")
scan.limit(1)
}
return scanResponse.items().map { it.toTask() }
}
...
private fun MutableMap<String, AttributeValue>.toTask() =
Task(this["task_id"]!!.n().toInt(), this["description"]!!.s() )
}
This should make the tests to pass without any problem.
Both tests are creating a new connection to the database, we have to fix that to connect only once and to remove duplications of elements that will be used in the other tests.
The helper is being created every test and with the helper, a new connection is being created, this is a good thing to be created only once and at the start of the tests, also the DynamoDBTaskRepository can be instantiated every new test by junit.
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
private val dynamoDBHelper: DynamoDBHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
private lateinit var dynamoDbTaskRepository: DynamoDbTaskRepository
@BeforeEach
internal fun setUp() {
dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDBHelper.dynamoDbClient)
}
@Test
internal fun `add Task to DynamoDB`() {
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
dynamoDbTaskRepository.save(task)
val storedTask = dynamoDBHelper.findById(task.id.toString())
assertEquals(storedTask, task)
}
@Test
internal fun `retrieve all Tasks`() {
val task1 = Task(1, "Task description")
val task2 = Task(2, "Another task description")
dynamoDBHelper.save(task1, task2)
val tasks = dynamoDbTaskRepository.all()
assertEquals(listOf(task2, task1), tasks)
}
}
Now with DynamoDBHelper and DynamoDbTaskRepository extracted as fields, the other change needed is to delete the table before each test. Recreating the table is easy since there is no way to delete all the items the best way is to delete the table and create a new one. This is something that the repository is already doing, the changes that were done to have everything set is:
Make the setupTable public available:
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
fun setupTable() {
deleteTable()
createTable()
}
}
and make the test recreate the table before every test:
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
private val dynamoDBHelper: DynamoDBHelper = DynamoDBHelper.connect()
private lateinit var dynamoDbTaskRepository: DynamoDbTaskRepository
@BeforeEach
internal fun setUp() {
dynamoDbTaskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(dynamoDBHelper.dynamoDbClient)
dynamoDBHelper.setupTable()
}
...
}
It's important to mention here,
Scanwill return the items in descending order. So if the order is something important for you, a sorting step will have to take place after retrieving the items for the database. In case of aQueryinstead of aScanthe parameterScanIndexForwardcan be settrueand DynamoDB will return the items in ascending order.
To err is human, to delete is forgetting. It's time to implement the delete method. As always, we start with a test inserting something to the database, deleting what we just inserted and checking if that isn't in the database.
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `delete Task from the table`() {
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
dynamoDBHelper.save(task)
dynamoDbTaskRepository.delete(task.id)
assertThrows<ItemNotFoundInTable> {
dynamoDBHelper.findById(task.id.toString())
}
}
}
class DynamoDBHelper(val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) {
fun findById(taskId: String): Task {
val item = dynamoDbClient.getItem(
GetItemRequest.builder()
.tableName(tableName)
.key(mapOf(primaryKey to AttributeValue.builder().n(taskId).build()))
.build()
).item()
if (item.isEmpty())
throw ItemNotFoundInTable()
return Task.from(item)
}
}
The only new thing in this test is the assertThrows<ItemNotFoundInTable>, this checks if a method call will throw an exception, and the ItemNotFoundInTable is an exception created to be thrown by the helper in case there is no item returned. Running the tests, they are failing for the right reasons, so it's time to move to the implementation.
class DynamoDbTaskRepository(private val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) : TaskRepository {
private val tableName = "tasqui"
override fun delete(id: Int) {
dynamoDbClient.deleteItem { delete ->
delete.tableName(tableName)
delete.key(mapOf("task_id" to id.toAttributeValue()))
}
}
...
}
This is the easiest operation to do, only the tableName and the key need to be informed, and the deletion will happen. This part there isn't much to refactor, so we can skip for now.
The last method to be implemented is nextId, this words as the Primary Key generator. The last item has to be retrieved and then we increment 1 to the item id. In this case, a Scan limited to one item would have the desired effect since the Scan is in descending order.
The first test can start on a happy path where there's already an item in the database:
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `retrieve the last inserted id plus one`() {
val task = Task(1, "Task description")
dynamoDBHelper.save(task)
val nextId = dynamoDbTaskRepository.nextId()
assertEquals(2, nextId)
}
}
and the implementation would be:
class DynamoDbTaskRepository(private val dynamoDbClient: DynamoDbClient) : TaskRepository {
private val tableName = "tasqui"
override fun nextId(): Int {
val items = dynamoDbClient.scan { scan ->
scan.tableName(tableName)
scan.attributesToGet("task_id")
}.items()
val lastId = items
.map { it["task_id"]!!.n().toInt() }
.max() ?: 0
return lastId + 1
}
}
It's a Scan operation like the one in all() but with scan.attributesToGet("task_id") so the response will only contain the task_id and will be smaller in general. Then that result is converted to the biggest integer. Kotlin has the elvis operator ?: that helps to handle null values, so if there is no items returned the value will be zero. To cover that case we add a test without inserting any task in the arrange part:
class DynamoDbTaskRepositoryShould {
@Test
internal fun `first id should be 1`() {
val nextId = dynamoDbTaskRepository.nextId()
assertEquals(1, nextId)
}
}
There isn't much to do, just check if the response from DynamoDB is empty and return 1 for it.
All tests are passing, everything for the repository is implemented, the only thing missing is a real connecting to the DynamoDB client.
With all the methods of the repository implemented, its possible to change the application to use the DynamoDBTaskRepository.
class Runner {
companion object {
@JvmStatic
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val taskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository()
val console = Console()
Tasqui()
.subcommands(Add(taskRepository),Tasks(taskRepository, console), Delete(taskRepository))
.main(args)
}
}
}
The only problem is that when we try to create a new repository a DynamoDbClient need to be injected. We don't have any production code for that, so we have to create a some. There's already a connection being created in the helper, we can use the repository:
class DynamoDBConnection {
companion object {
fun connect() : DynamoDbClient {
return DynamoDbClient.builder()
.build() ?: throw IllegalStateException()
}
}
}
class Runner {
companion object {
@JvmStatic
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val taskRepository = DynamoDbTaskRepository(DynamoDBConnection.connect())
val console = Console()
Tasqui()
.subcommands(Add(taskRepository),Tasks(taskRepository, console), Delete(taskRepository))
.main(args)
}
}
}
And change the commands to use the TaskRepository interface instead of the implementations.
class Tasqui : CliktCommand() {
override fun run() = Unit
}
class Add(private val taskRepository: TaskRepository) : CliktCommand("Add new task") {
private val description by argument("description", "Task description")
override fun run() {
taskRepository.save(Task(taskRepository.nextId(), description))
}
}
class Tasks(private val taskRepository: TaskRepository, private val console: Console)
: CliktCommand("Prints all tasks") {
override fun run() {
val tasks = taskRepository.all()
tasks.map { "${it.id} - ${it.description}" }
.forEach(console::print)
}
}
class Delete(private val taskRepository: TaskRepository) : CliktCommand("Delete a task") {
private val taskId by argument(help = "Id of the task to be deleted").int()
override fun run() {
taskRepository.delete(taskId)
}
}
This is a very simplistic way of doing the connection, it will get the default profile credentials from your .aws/credentials file in the home folder. Amazon provide the ProfileCredentialsProvider if you want a different profile. You can see more about other ways of authenticating here.
After doing all the changes you really want to use that as an application, you can package using gradle and the command gradle assembleDist will generate a zip and a tar inside the build/distributions folder. You can use the tasqui inside that folder without having to call java -jar or passing any extra arguments besides the ones for the application.
