Often I see Unit Tests with the test methods that have the same name as the method under test prefixed with the word "test" e.g.
testSubmitApplication. This provides no extra information on which "flow" of the mothod is being tested. Other test method names provide a bit more information by suffixing the nature of the test e.g.
testSubmitApplicationWithInvalidCriteria. It better but not much better. A number of IDEs actually allow the developer to generate test method names based on the class under test which in my opinion defeats the object.
Unit test methods should be named in such as way that they provide a clear description of the test. In my opinion the prefix "test" is redundent and should never appear in your test method names unless it is part of the domain vocabulary. For example
AppicationSubmittedWithInvalidCriteriaMustRaiseException* is more informative then
testSubmitApplication. Providing a more descriptive name also serves to keep a clear focus on the flow under test and leads the devloper to create a test method per flow.
Please Note that the example method name is a simplification. I would consider the term "InvalidCriteria" a bit too high-level for a real unit test. It should be more specific such as
Mash is a pragmatic software craftsman always looking to improve his software creation skills and helping others do the same. He firmly believes that a well-rounded software craftsman must have a keen interest in all aspects of software creation, including; process, people, technology, user experience, development, operation, maintenance, and social impact. He relishes the daily challenges that Codurance brings to him–stretching his existing knowledge and expertise allowing him to constantly grow as a professional.
Mash is an advisor and a leader. During his diverse career, he has succeeded in invigorating large ailing software projects as well as creating highly effective software teams and departments. His broad and deep technical knowledge, organisational skills, craft focus, and empathy to people involved have been integral to his success. He has worked in many roles for charities, investment banks, consultancies, government, media and cloud providers. He prides himself at being a hands-on software developer and believes that software development skills are very hard to learn and the best way to maintain them is to apply them.All author posts
Software is our passion.
We are software craftspeople. We build well-crafted software for our clients, we help developers to get better at their craft through training, coaching and mentoring, and we help companies get better at delivering software.